Kim Kardashian is always embroiled in drama. She is a billionaire, but it appears that she will never give up her pride. Kim reportedly demanded that her ex-male housekeeper pay her $2,500 for playing games in a court battle over unpaid wages.
According to Radar Online, Kim Kardashian has asked that her ex-housekeeper be sanctioned in court for allegedly playing games in their legal battle, which was initiated by members of the reality star’s former staff. The 41-year-old reality star has requested a Los Angeles Superior Court judge to order her ex-employee Andrew Ramirez to pay her $2,475.
Kim stated in her motion that she had to return to court because Andrew refused to accept the answers she filed as part of the case. During the battle, Andrew asked Kim a series of questions that he wanted to be answered under oath. Andrew took issue with Kim’s response since it came from her estate manager.
Andrew argued that Kim, not her employee, should be required to fill out the paperwork. He requested that the court penalize Kim $1,857. Kim’s attorneys are now opposing the motion and want their own set of sanctions.
They argue that the estate manager’s replies are appropriate and that the court should accept them. A decision has yet to be issued by a judge. Andrew, as previously reported, is one of seven ex-employees who are suing the former Keeping Up with the Kardashians star.
All the plaintiffs claim to have worked in Kim’s Hidden Hills compound. According to the lawsuit, the employees were promised full-time jobs with benefits. However, they were paid as independent contractors, leaving them without the promised benefits.
They further stated that they were not properly compensated or given ample food breaks. Their lawyer stated that his clients were not paid on a regular basis and were not issued pay stubs for their hours worked. Kim and her staff have worked tirelessly to shift the blame to a third-party company.
Kim’s representative stated that the reality star billionaire had no control over the employees or their salary. Kim’s representative said that she is “not responsible for how the vendor manages their business and the agreements they have made directly with their staff.”
Kim doesn’t really appear to be giving up. Let’s see what happens. To get the latest updates, keep an eye on Thirsty.
What’s your opinion on this one? Let us know in the comments!